A new generation of youthful political leaders is ascending to office across the United States by channeling their personal experience with firearms tragedies to advocate for reforms they contend the public is ready for.
Their ascent signifies a multi-year shift. Firearms safety has moved from a third-rail issue rarely spoken about on the stump to a core issue that politicians, predominantly Democrats, are now running – and winning – on.
This evolution is fueled in part by a national weariness with firearms deaths, encompassing large-scale attacks – such as recent incidents at Brown University and Bondi Beach – as well as firearms suicides and street violence, which persist in devastating countless families and communities.
“This is a problem that has impacted my life,” explained Justin Pearson. “Serving as a state representative and seeing government inaction, while recalling the effects in my community, that compelled me to say this is an issue we must address urgently.”
Ironically, the day he was sworn in was also the most lethal attack in Tennessee history, when three children and three adults were shot and killed at a Covenant school.
Shortly after, he and two other state Democrats led a protest on the legislative chamber to call for stricter firearms laws. Pearson and his colleague were expelled for their protest, an act that propelled them to national prominence. They later were reinstated.
Months later, his sibling died of a firearm suicide. This was not his first encounter with tragic death; just years before, his mentor and a former classmate were also fatally shot in Memphis.
Now, he is campaigning for a federal office by centering gun violence at the core of his agenda. He highlights how it affects the state’s youth, for whom gunshot wounds are the leading cause of death.
The rise of candidates centering gun violence is also a result of the expanding advocacy network across the country, which has become a pipeline for political newcomers.
“I see myself as a small part of a larger cause. It’s the reason I got into politics,” noted Frost. “I was 15 when Sandy Hook happened and that’s what inspired me to get involved.”
Today, challenging pro-gun groups like the NRA is standard practice among Democratic candidates. But less than 15 years ago, many moderate Democrats held high ratings from the organization, and the topic of gun control was considered a career-ending issue.
“It was a slow process and full of ups and downs,” said a violence-prevention activist. “We saw our supporters seeking election and thought it was logical that someone advocating for laws would want to take the next step.”
Many point to the Sandy Hook Elementary tragedy and the lack of action in Congress to pass gun-safety policies as a turning point. This pushed once NRA-backed politicians to risk their high ratings to support restrictions on assault weapons. Now, receiving a poor grade from the group is a point of pride.
“After the Florida school shooting, zero Democratic members of Congress had an A rating and were boasting of it. That’s a seismic shift,” the advocate continued. “It shattered a lot of myths and anxieties about being proactive on this issue.”
The issue of gun violence has also activated first-time entrants to politics.
A Tennessee mother lost her son in a Waffle House attack in Nashville. Tragically, another son was wounded leaving a concert. After repeated trips of pleading at the capitol with no response, she decided to become a candidate herself.
“Testifying for seven years and having them just ignoring me, showed me that I needed to do something greater than what I was doing,” she said.
“When people see you’re directly affected, they feel that you’re more credible to talk about this. They know it’s not a political thing for us,” she added.
These personal experiences of loss connect individuals across the nation, forming what those affected describe as a “group no one wants to join.”
“We don’t have a formal network, but we all feel compelled in this moment to be a part of the solution,” the representative said of his colleagues. “The world is riddled with entrenched problems. We’ve given people generations to address them. And now, with our constituents’ support, the moment is ours.”
He argues that tackling gun violence also requires focusing on common-ground problems like mental health access and housing security, which might find more traction even in conservative legislatures. This broader view shows that being committed to ending gun violence isn’t solely concerning restrictions, but also about improving the underlying conditions.
“We’re not single-issue candidates,” he emphasized. “We understand the connected nature of the problems. It’s not just gun violence. It’s poverty, pollution, neglected neighborhoods – these are the places with the most severe rates of violence. We need leaders who have proximity to that pain.”
In the end, Pearson says inaction at the federal level on measures like red flag laws and cooling-off periods has real consequences.
“Due to this stagnation, people are dying,” he stated firmly. “This problem isn’t going to be solved by repeating old strategies.”
Wildlife biologist specializing in sloth research with over a decade of field experience in Central and South America.